few weeks ago I heard about on the radio in a resounding news: a fashion magazine had dared to put on the cover size models. Must be a novelty in the tight world of fashion that extends between the large female audience. Applauded the proposal and considered this bold a sign that times are changing, even debated whether the fee establecidísimo thinness was finally starting to lose strength and somehow made reference to the discrimination that exists in the fashion with large sizes, which are not only muejeres, indeed.
To me, excuse me, I think discrimination goes beyond size.
Photo: Elle First I want to point out that, now that I've added kilos and bulk to my body, I need a size 42-yes, dear (and loved) at very specific driving me mad, but at least I'm not obsessed , which is what matters most to me, and what a coincidence! is just the size I find most difficult to find in stores. Looking at the street, watching women go, I think that is because it is the most common size and is therefore just before. "Do you think that is different? There may be more reasons, I keep my eyes open to your opinions, but I think that's the reason.
So much good, there would be no more than provide the stores with more of such stock and fixed sizes.
in magazines and on runways will be very little that size, perhaps among the famous, there is always someone "bold" and sure enough in itself to keep her dignity and naturalness. Dignity because it seems to say who has give a penalty or it was something temporary, "has caught a few kilos", "goes on a diet", etc.. (Well, this is a reflection of my current disagreement, I have to admit, I need more time to accept it).
saying that I was 42, sometimes 44 to 40, appear to be in magazines, much less on the runways, and seem to always need to lose kilos, eating more healthy, care for or be to plan (a diet). This footbridge and magazines in more widespread. At the other extreme, one might say, are the gateways, magazines, shops and other businesses specialized in "plus sizes." I need your existence, for those who can not find clothes to suit has every right to be able to choose different models to be fashionable and feel comfortable and identify with what you saw. Stores that sell these sizes, there must be for the simple fact that the other stores of brands, which are everywhere and are to be addressed by the majority of people do not give a full sizing. I think it's understandable to not have all sizes, for reasons of profitability or, perhaps, and sadly, for reasons of image. Which is understood not to deny that one is saved their opinion, of course.
In a way, I think discrimination: I can not go to a store because they have my size, I have to go elsewhere. But as through the passage of time and who has managed to do a job opportunity, if not a business-to large sizes, it is much easier to find the nearest fashion in all aspects, I will to say that there is discrimination, and say that there is a distinction . However, and here I wanted to get the body in fashion this footbridge y. .. blabla has changed over the years and it was this, and changed the canon and the acceptance of a "body 10". Before you wanted a woman with crows, a pronounced hip sometimes, other generous bust, and others with both. Now he wants a body "plastic" that only a few "chosen" is either by nature or based managed scalpel. Sometimes based on suffering, not to forget.
I thought that being a model loooooooong was more than having a body in accordance with the canon was a face, a photogenic, a knowledge to be able to take the pledge and a glamorous show know, dazzle and convince with gestures and looks. In short, something nice to know show to attract looks, natural shine. Because, after all, being a model is to make a living mannequin-expression-let me sell a product. However, today has been sooo much value to what is put on the catwalk, we accept all that is seen in terms of the concerns and models. Well, do you want to tell you, to me there are models that I find ugly, lacking in grace and poise, not to mention that opinion is heard here and there of "is horrible, is skinny, how ugly." But as evidenced above the walkway, we accept the view of another and understand that this has to be pretty and have to be fashionable. I fear that today everything is at the mercy of the general public what was once "idea of \u200b\u200bdesign" and liked it, you are seeing today, a large majority of the public do not like those ideas. Here we must point out two things. One, the fashion runway has been done, I think, for characters of a higher economic status and it is understandable that designers look to like them and not those who are "characters on the street" come on, that Fashion case is made for a small group. And two, that this small group needs, I'm not sure why, perhaps because of pride, "distinguished from the" rabble "and in a world where almost all are amplified, how different from another is to find a style, a canon, outside the reach of most. Because either can not afford a personal trainer, a nutritionist who will control, a facelift that will remove and put him and rejuvenate you when you need it. That's part of glamor today: get boobs, ribs removed, stretching the skin, put hair where there is not, etc.
I also keep my opinion about it, right?
I want to stress this idea of \u200b\u200b criterion, that resonates in the minds of anyone reading this, please. Because not infrequently accept an external criterion and our railed. Not because it comes in dozens of magazines, you have to like it, nor to be something healthy and natural. "Whether we like artificial today?
I'm giving a lot of laps, I noticed that a long time without writing and I may be disappointed.
When he said that discrimination was beyond the size, I was thinking about the nature of each. Refine this time because women want to talk about the constitution, body shape that has each and that usually does not happen with male bodies. genetics, hormones and do not know if any other factor, there are several types of association among women. For months they said in the media that stores would have to distinguish their brands by body type. I do not know what names they gave to each, meeting in the network, for example, who calls: triangle, rectangle, hourglass inverted triangle, always paying attention to the curves. Imagine a triangle, will refer to a body fat accumulates in the lower body (thighs, hips) or a rectangle, cover a body in which energy is accumulated evenly throughout the body, a body with just bends and so on.
All born a constitution, which begins to appear at puberty and is consolidated by the development. It is a process, a natural evolution can not be stopped. We have a constitution or another, and a complexion (strong, thin, middle) or otherwise.
Why, then, we intend to use the same clothes? It is logical that we do not feel the same. Who set it at design? There are shops (department stores), thanks to modern, we suggest, and I've only seen in jeans, the model of these: hips, waist high, narrow waist, cut straight, narrow or wide leg ... and whatever, that does not know them by heart.
initiatives I know of clothes for a body type or another, let alone gateways!. The sizes are for hugging fee (imposed by an external criterion, remember) and large sizes. And besides, despite the size, can not have one way or another body? Or is that in the eyes of fashion there is only one model? Progongo designers here, new clothing designers, who specialize in female body shape: triangle, square, whatever. In a world so difficult, would be a negligible option to exit the market. Will we ever see on the runway several types of body? Can you imagine a Versace or Dolce & Gabbana for a body triangle from the entire collection?
naturalize would be a form of reality, accept it, because not all women "class" will have the body of the canon, not all will feel bad about having so much change. (Or does she? What would the world then?)
Finally I wanted to share with you and you a memory of adolescence. It was a time when I just saw those lovely slender bodies and was what he aspired. But there was a girl in another class, which made my then-boyfriend doubted the love he felt towards me, I did not like, but I loved it. I mean, was and still is-a girl low rise, which for me were extra kilos, come on, plump, but with a style and a face, which I would have liked me. Her haircut, her smile, energy balanced that he looked, I no longer looked respectable, but charming. Natural, authentic and very pretty face in common than their face: skin and brown hair, brown eyes, no extra features. Years pass and when I see it is just great!
not think I felt jealous, then or now, but I called a lot of attention that a person with those extra pounds had such elegance. I did not talk to her, but who knew of my background I never said anything against it.
Bonito, right?
I hope you liked my story. The reflections do ye @ s, choose the conclusions you want.
I leave a link to a post that I liked: XXL Women .
A greeting.
Thank you for your subscription! Head over to the blog and leave me your comments or send me an email if you think appropriate. 
0 comments:
Post a Comment